If we were to insert the word "on" into the previously examined passages, then they would say something like, Jesus would be raised "on" the third day. This addition somewhat agrees with the philosophy of those who truly believe that Jesus was crucified and died on Friday, where they claim that Jesus was in the tomb for part of the day on Friday, all day Saturday, and part of Sunday and that he rose "on" this third day from the grave. The problem with this interpretation is that the thirty-first verse of the eight chapter of the book according to the gospel of Mark, tells a slightly different story.
And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again (Mark 8:31).
Please note that this passage did not use any words that would imply that Jesus was to be raise in three days or that he would be raise on the third day. This passage clearly states that after three days Jesus would be raise again, which is somewhat different from what the earlier passages that we examined appeared to imply. They appeared to suggest that Jesus would be raised again "on" the third day. But what if the meaning of the earlier passages were intended to be interpreted as after the third day, instead of "on" the third day? If this interpretation was used of the earlier passages, then they would all be in agreement with this passage, which would show that intent was to say that Jesus would be raised after three days or after the third day.